Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
47 messages Options
123
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont

Hi Mark,

I will spin up an Azure VM this week to try compile Activiz 6.2

I will let you know how it goes, if doesnt work well I will contact you.

Regards,

Matias

On Sep 14, 2015 2:19 AM, "Mark DeArman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers


_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
Yes, if you do the entire build with VS2008, most likely you will need to patch nothing except for those library inputs and those PInvoke signatures which I emailed you, 
 
All the other patches to mummy and activiz had to do with .NET 4.0 compatibility and Intel C++.
 
Image of the sample running :-)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10205892603607509&l=9d2363fc4e
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Matias Montroull" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 10:26 PM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 

Hi Mark,

I will spin up an Azure VM this week to try compile Activiz 6.2

I will let you know how it goes, if doesnt work well I will contact you.

Regards,

Matias

On Sep 14, 2015 2:19 AM, "Mark DeArman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank" value="+12532005353">(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

oscarafone77
Hi Mark,

I tried to do that in august but got no luck and I gave up trying, I don't remember exactly what the errors I had but they seemed to be related to some porting issues.
What was hard was related to the instructions which are based on VS2008 (I have VS 2012 pro but I also downloaded VS2008) and seems to be a bit obsolete.
I am wondering if you could post a small guide with the (hopefully detailed) list of things you have done to succeed in building activiz 6.2 (also compilers versions), and where you retrieved the sources you used. Or in alternative if you could share somehow your build sources or directly the binaries

I hope not to have asked too much

Thank you
Oscar
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
In reply to this post by Mark DeArman
Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have VS2008 to do the build.
I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare I'll leave to someone with more time.
I am not a C++ template guru.
 
But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead of .NET 2.0. 
 
Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right now, so it will be a little bit.
 
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi Mark,
 
Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of  activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
 
Thanks
 
 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank" value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
 
 
 
--
With Kind Regards:
Mallikarjuna K,
07795531103/09908238861.
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
I have uploaded some notes and the cmake cache files to:
 
What's left?  Well the biggest thing would be fixing gccxml.  But a stop gap measure might be to change the build a little bit so that once the export layer has been generated with mummy, the second build pass is done with a different compiler.  This would get rid of the MSCRT9.0 dependency which I see as the biggest issue right now.  You have this extra runtime getting linked in, which is doing nothing but reference management between VTK and .NET.  This is just plain old goofy.
 
Anyway good luck,
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Mark DeArman" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:19 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have VS2008 to do the build.
I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare I'll leave to someone with more time.
I am not a C++ template guru.
 
But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead of .NET 2.0. 
 
Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right now, so it will be a little bit.
 
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi Mark,
 
Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of  activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
 
Thanks
 
 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank" value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
 
 
 
--
With Kind Regards:
Mallikarjuna K,
07795531103/09908238861.
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

oscarafone77
In reply to this post by Mark DeArman
Thank you very much Mark,

great job!
I will try next days to follow your instructions,

Thank you
Oscar

2015-09-15 1:19 GMT+02:00 Mark DeArman [via VTK]
<[hidden email]>:

> Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have
> VS2008 to do the build.
> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare I'll
> leave to someone with more time.
> I am not a C++ template guru.
>
> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead of
> .NET 2.0.
>
> Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right
> now, so it will be a little bit.
>
> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>
>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in
>> contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my
>> first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>> breeze.
>>
>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>> got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the
>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>
>>  I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank"
>> value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/Activiz-6-2-with-VTK-6-2-and-NET-4-0-Build-Success-tp5733889p5733924.html
> To unsubscribe from Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success,
> click here.
> NAML
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
In reply to this post by Mark DeArman
Mallikarjun,
Your very welcome.  I hope they'll help someone else out.  I've been very excited about using Activiz in a project for years.  Since I was a kid stuck running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software, so I had a great time working on the build.
 
gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports.  Mummy reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files.  I really have not dug into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi Mark,
 
Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++ program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK  which has a generator for xml.
 
Thank you.
 
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have VS2008 to do the build.
I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare I'll leave to someone with more time.
I am not a C++ template guru.
 
But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead of .NET 2.0. 
 
Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right now, so it will be a little bit.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank" value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi Mark,
 
Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of  activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
 
Thanks
 
 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
I finally finished patching and testing the build.
VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
 
If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a breeze.  
 
The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the configure step, and just make it another build step.
 
 I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank" value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
 
 
 
--
With Kind Regards:
Mallikarjuna K,
<a href="tel:07795531103" target="_blank" value="+917795531103">07795531103/<a href="tel:09908238861" target="_blank" value="+919908238861">09908238861.
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
 
 
 
--
With Kind Regards:
Mallikarjuna K,
07795531103/09908238861.
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

VTK - Users mailing list
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome.  I hope they'll help someone else out.  I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years.  Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports.  Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files.  I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK  which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> (253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>>  I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> (253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

oscarafone77
In reply to this post by Mark DeArman
Hi Mark,

I started to follow your instructions and while gcc compiles and
installs perfectly, as soon as I try to build mummy I get into some
errors.
I attach a txt file with the VS2008 output during build.
If I go to the bin\release directory I cannot find for example
kitware.runtime.dll and I guess many other files haven't been built.
Am I forgetting something? Consider that I don't have much of
experience with c++

Oscar

2015-09-16 7:14 GMT+02:00 Mark DeArman [via VTK]
<[hidden email]>:

> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome.  I hope they'll help someone else out.  I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years.  Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports.  Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files.  I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK  which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013.  Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory.  I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank"
>> value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2  with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories.  This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files.  I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>>  I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" target="_blank"
>>> value="+912532005353">(253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> <a href="tel:07795531103" target="_blank"
>> value="+917795531103">07795531103/<a href="tel:09908238861" target="_blank"
>> value="+919908238861">09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/Activiz-6-2-with-VTK-6-2-and-NET-4-0-Build-Success-tp5733889p5733956.html
> To unsubscribe from Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success,
> click here.
> NAML

mummy.txt (6M) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
In reply to this post by VTK - Users mailing list
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> (253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> (253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont
Hi,

I was able to build ActiViz successfully. Altough Mummy did not completely built, I got the 2 Kitware.Mummy DLLs that are needed for ActiViz to be built as well as the mummy.exe file.

I thank Mark for all the information he provided, I'll try to post the steps I followed, it's pretty similar to what you can find in the Wiki Page but there are some tweaks that need to be done in order to get it working.

I had to add the vtkRenderingContextOpenGL-6.2.lib before configuring the project with Cmake and needed to change vtkCommonEL_dll to vtkCommonCoreEL_dll in some of the .in files and vtkGraphicsEL_dll to vtkFiltersProgrammableEL_dll in the vtkProgrammableAttributeDataFilter_Extra.cs

Regards,

Matias.

El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 3:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> (253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> (253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

oscarafone77
Hi Matias,

I am interested in knowing what tweaks you did to get it work.
Whatever I do I only get the runtime.unmanaged dll but not the runtime.managed one

Thank you
Oscar
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont
Hi Oscar,

When I downloaded mummy I did it from git:
git clone <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="git://public.kitware.com/mummy.git" style="text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51,102,187);padding-right:13px;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.7px;font-style:italic;line-height:19.05px;background-image:url();background-repeat:no-repeat">git://public.kitware.com/mummy.git

Then I created the .snk file with SDK and modified the Cmakelist.txt file to set the path to my .snk file

One important step is to add these lines in mummy/CMakeLists.txt:
SET(gccxml_compiler "${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER}")
IF(MSVC80)
  SET(gccxml_compiler "msvc8")
ENDIF(MSVC80)
IF(MSVC90)
  SET(gccxml_compiler "msvc9")
ENDIF(MSVC90)
SET (GCCXML_EXTRA_D_ARGS "_HAS_TR1=0")
  • This must be at the top of the file or else the variable GCCXML_EXTRA_D_ARGS will not be set for CMakeLists.txt. Best to add after CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED line.

Then make sure you select Visual 9 in Cmake, I assume you instaklled Visual C++ 2008

El lun., 21 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:26 a. m., oscarafone77 <[hidden email]> escribió:
Hi Matias,

I am interested in knowing what tweaks you did to get it work.
Whatever I do I only get the runtime.unmanaged dll but not the
runtime.managed one

Thank you
Oscar



--
View this message in context: http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/Activiz-6-2-with-VTK-6-2-and-NET-4-0-Build-Success-tp5733889p5734032.html
Sent from the VTK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

David E DeMarle
In reply to this post by Matimont
Please feel free to update the wiki page directly. Also, post a link to it in this thread when you do. That way the information will have the best visibility for others to find.

thanks




David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Matias Montroull <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I was able to build ActiViz successfully. Altough Mummy did not completely built, I got the 2 Kitware.Mummy DLLs that are needed for ActiViz to be built as well as the mummy.exe file.

I thank Mark for all the information he provided, I'll try to post the steps I followed, it's pretty similar to what you can find in the Wiki Page but there are some tweaks that need to be done in order to get it working.

I had to add the vtkRenderingContextOpenGL-6.2.lib before configuring the project with Cmake and needed to change vtkCommonEL_dll to vtkCommonCoreEL_dll in some of the .in files and vtkGraphicsEL_dll to vtkFiltersProgrammableEL_dll in the vtkProgrammableAttributeDataFilter_Extra.cs

Regards,

Matias.

El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 3:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers



_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Mark DeArman
In reply to this post by Matimont
I did't do a x64 build.  I will be next month.  
I'm also going to look into switching from gccxml to CastXML with the gccxml emulation mode.
 
All you should need to do is switch the arch in the VS solution configuration manager for VTK and Activiz.
You shouldn't need to change anything at the CMAKE level or regenerate.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Matias Montroull" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:27 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Mark, one question, were you able to build the 64 bits version of this? I noticed mine was buiolt using 32 bits. What needs to happen to build 64 bits?
Thank you!
Matias.
 
El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 11:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
Great news!  Glad to hear you got it all built.  Now the hard part has started for me, actually getting the viewmodels put together to interface with our application ;-)
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Matias Montroull" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:42 PM
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi,
 
I was able to build ActiViz successfully. Altough Mummy did not completely built, I got the 2 Kitware.Mummy DLLs that are needed for ActiViz to be built as well as the mummy.exe file.
 
I thank Mark for all the information he provided, I'll try to post the steps I followed, it's pretty similar to what you can find in the Wiki Page but there are some tweaks that need to be done in order to get it working.
 
I had to add the vtkRenderingContextOpenGL-6.2.lib before configuring the project with Cmake and needed to change vtkCommonEL_dll to vtkCommonCoreEL_dll in some of the .in files and vtkGraphicsEL_dll to vtkFiltersProgrammableEL_dll in the vtkProgrammableAttributeDataFilter_Extra.cs
 
Regards,
 
Matias.
 
El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 3:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> (253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> (253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> (253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont

Thank you Mark,
I'm downloading VS Standard which provides the x64 mode when generating with Cmake. I was using VS express and selecting just Visual Studio 9 in Cmake.
I will give it a try tomorrow
Thanks.
Matias

Matias

On Sep 23, 2015 7:47 PM, "Mark DeArman" <[hidden email]> wrote:
I did't do a x64 build.  I will be next month.  
I'm also going to look into switching from gccxml to CastXML with the gccxml emulation mode.
 
All you should need to do is switch the arch in the VS solution configuration manager for VTK and Activiz.
You shouldn't need to change anything at the CMAKE level or regenerate.
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Matias Montroull" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:27 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Mark, one question, were you able to build the 64 bits version of this? I noticed mine was buiolt using 32 bits. What needs to happen to build 64 bits?
Thank you!
Matias.
 
El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 11:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
Great news!  Glad to hear you got it all built.  Now the hard part has started for me, actually getting the viewmodels put together to interface with our application ;-)
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "Matias Montroull" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:42 PM
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
Hi,
 
I was able to build ActiViz successfully. Altough Mummy did not completely built, I got the 2 Kitware.Mummy DLLs that are needed for ActiViz to be built as well as the mummy.exe file.
 
I thank Mark for all the information he provided, I'll try to post the steps I followed, it's pretty similar to what you can find in the Wiki Page but there are some tweaks that need to be done in order to get it working.
 
I had to add the vtkRenderingContextOpenGL-6.2.lib before configuring the project with Cmake and needed to change vtkCommonEL_dll to vtkCommonCoreEL_dll in some of the .in files and vtkGraphicsEL_dll to vtkFiltersProgrammableEL_dll in the vtkProgrammableAttributeDataFilter_Extra.cs
 
Regards,
 
Matias.
 
El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 3:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

oscarafone77
aaaahh

I am going crazy,

I finally got to build activiz (by compiling ALLBUILD), and now kitware.mummy.runtime.dll is created, while kitware.VTK.dll not. In total there are 9 dlls not created.

I then tried to compile kitware.VTK alone, just to see what happens, but Visual studio 2008 highlights a number of missing cs files under the "csharp" directory. See attachment

What am I doing wrong?

Thank you
Oscar

errors.txt
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont
That's a weird error... Did you check to see if the files are indeed there?

El jue., 24 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 12:49 p. m., oscarafone77 <[hidden email]> escribió:
aaaahh

I am going crazy,

I finally got to build activiz (by compiling ALLBUILD), and now
kitware.mummy.runtime.dll is created, while kitware.VTK.dll not. In total
there are 9 dlls not created.

I then tried to compile kitware.VTK alone, just to see what happens, but
Visual studio 2008 highlights a number of missing cs files under the
"csharp" directory. See attachment

What am I doing wrong?

Thank you
Oscar

errors.txt <http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/file/n5734113/errors.txt>



--
View this message in context: http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/Activiz-6-2-with-VTK-6-2-and-NET-4-0-Build-Success-tp5733889p5734113.html
Sent from the VTK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success

Matimont
In reply to this post by David E DeMarle
Hi David,

How can I get permissions to edit the WiKi instructions? I'd like to include what I haev to do to build AtiViz 6.2 successfully.

Thanks,

El lun., 21 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 11:13 a. m., David E DeMarle <[hidden email]> escribió:
Please feel free to update the wiki page directly. Also, post a link to it in this thread when you do. That way the information will have the best visibility for others to find.

thanks




David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Matias Montroull <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I was able to build ActiViz successfully. Altough Mummy did not completely built, I got the 2 Kitware.Mummy DLLs that are needed for ActiViz to be built as well as the mummy.exe file.

I thank Mark for all the information he provided, I'll try to post the steps I followed, it's pretty similar to what you can find in the Wiki Page but there are some tweaks that need to be done in order to get it working.

I had to add the vtkRenderingContextOpenGL-6.2.lib before configuring the project with Cmake and needed to change vtkCommonEL_dll to vtkCommonCoreEL_dll in some of the .in files and vtkGraphicsEL_dll to vtkFiltersProgrammableEL_dll in the vtkProgrammableAttributeDataFilter_Extra.cs

Regards,

Matias.

El mié., 16 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 3:20 p. m., Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> escribió:
>Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
>other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
>the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.
 
Because I don't use git.  We use TFS at work, and the easiest way to publish it was to zip it all up and put it on a cloud drive.
 
Re: gcc-xml and Mummy, I agree that abandoning gccxml is the real solution.  What is the point in patching it for modern VS support if it's a dead project.  Fixing mummy to support the standard VTK wrapping libraries makes the most since.
 
 
Mark DeArman
Cascade Acoustic Research
<a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
 

From: "David Cole" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: [hidden email]
Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
 
> "if my idea of adding a second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final library"

Yes, I think it absolutely could. It would be based on the assumption,
however, that the interface generated by analyzing the source under
the VS2008 environment would in the end be compatible with what you
compile and link for the final library. And it would mean a two-stage
build, with VS2008 still required for the first stage.

I would be interested to see if anybody can replace gcc-xml with the
new&improved CastXML, and still build ActiViz using a more modern VS
all in one go. I haven't had time to investigate bringing things up to
date for using CastXML, but if anybody else does, please do let us all
know here on the VTK lists.

Question for you:
Why not just publish a git branch with your changes on GitHub or some
other publicly hosted site? Perhaps your branch would get picked up by
the folks maintaining the ActiViz repo now.


Cheers,
David C.




On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Mallikarjun,
> Your very welcome. I hope they'll help someone else out. I've been very
> excited about using Activiz in a project for years. Since I was a kid stuck
> running BSD on mac68k I've always enjoyed the challenge of porting software,
> so I had a great time working on the build.
>
> gccxml generates the XML description of the C++ VTK library exports. Mummy
> reads these and generates the csharp wrapper files. I really have not dug
> into it deep enough yet to know how the Activiz export layer source fits
> into the puzzle, but if I get some time, I'll see if my idea of adding a
> second build step can get rid of the VS2008/MSCRT9 dependency for the final
> library.
>
> Mark DeArman
> Cascade Acoustic Research
> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:52 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build Success
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for sharing the source directories. One quick question..if I am not
> wrong,the purpose of gcc-xml is to generate the xml descryption of c++
> program, I found link https://github.com/dgobbi/WrapVTK which has a
> generator for xml.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Nothing will make it build in VS2013. Because of gccxml, you have to have
>> VS2008 to do the build.
>> I started to work on patching gccxml, but that was kind of a nightmare
>> I'll leave to someone with more time.
>> I am not a C++ template guru.
>>
>> But, the changes I've made build the binaries targeting .NET 4.0 instead
>> of .NET 2.0.
>>
>> Here is the link to the Source download directory. I'm uploading it right
>> now, so it will be a little bit.
>>
>>
>> https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=C21891647818579A!108957&authkey=!ADS9VLyqTef24FY&ithint=folder%2c
>>
>> Mark DeArman
>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: "Mallikarjun K" <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:55 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Activiz 6.2 with VTK-6.2 and .NET 4.0 Build
>> Success
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Can you send me the patched source directories. I want to make use of
>> activiz 6.2 for vtk 6.2 with vs2013?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mark DeArman <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I finally finished patching and testing the build.
>>> VTK-6.2 built with Intel C++ 14.0
>>> Activiz 6.2 built with .NET 4.0
>>> Mummy 1.0.3 built with .NET 4.0
>>>
>>> If anyone else is having trouble getting this working, feel free to get
>>> in contact with me, I can send you my patched source directories. This is
>>> my first experience with CMake, and I've got to say it sure made things a
>>> breeze.
>>>
>>> The only thing which drove me nuts was the number of times a full rebuild
>>> got triggered after patching individual source files. I wish the
>>> maintainers would remove the gccxml/mummy generate functions from the
>>> configure step, and just make it another build step.
>>>
>>> I hope I can get more involved with the project but I've got a lot of
>>> learning to do before I'd feel comfortable in CMake.
>>>
>>> Mark DeArman
>>> Cascade Acoustic Research
>>> http://www.cascadeacoustic.com
>>> <a href="tel:%28253%29%20200-5353" value="+12532005353" target="_blank">(253) 200-5353
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Kind Regards:
>> Mallikarjuna K,
>> 07795531103/09908238861.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Kind Regards:
> Mallikarjuna K,
> 07795531103/09908238861.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
 
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers


--
Matias

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
123